August 20, 2026
Transformation changes more than processes and structures; it also changes what is required of leadership. When companies enter new markets, evolve their business models, integrate acquisitions or realign their operating model, they create tasks whose impact extends far beyond individual functions. The central question is therefore not, in the first instance, who should fill a key position—it is which mandate the company needs for its next stage of development.
When a new management function is being created or a key role is to be filled, attention often turns first to the profile: What experience, industry knowledge and leadership capability are required?
For a sound appointment decision, however, the starting point lies one level earlier. What matters is the specific contribution the role is expected to make to the corporate agenda. A company scaling internationally needs a different leadership setup than one that is reorganizing its organizational and governance logic or integrating an acquisition.
Without this clarity, role profiles quickly become overloaded: strategic and operational, strong in transformation and experienced in line management, entrepreneurial and at the same time deeply specialized. The search becomes more complex without increasing the likelihood of an effective appointment.
A robust role profile therefore derives from the specific mandate of the company’s next phase. Only then can it be determined which experience, personality and leadership capability are actually required.
A Chief Transformation Officer and a Chief Restructuring Officer can both intervene deeply in the organization and in operational management. Their mandates, however, stem from different starting points.
A Chief Transformation Officer becomes relevant above all when strategic change has to be translated into operational execution—for example, when evolving the business model, scaling structures, managing a post-merger integration or realigning the operating model. The CTO’s task is to translate a cross-functional transformation agenda into clear priorities, accountabilities and measurable implementation.
A Chief Restructuring Officer, by contrast, typically takes on a mandate under greater time and performance pressure. The focus is then on stabilizing earnings, liquidity or operational performance, combined with high execution speed and short decision-making paths.
In practice, the boundaries are not always clear-cut. What matters, therefore, is not the title but the problem the role is meant to solve—and the time horizon within which impact is expected.
Before management, shareholders or the advisory board decide on specific candidates and the appropriate appointment model, three questions should be answered.
1. What Outcome Should the Role Achieve?
“Driving the transformation” is not a robust mandate. The assignment must be translated into concrete impact—for example, implementing a new operating model, completing an integration, scaling an international organization or achieving defined earnings and productivity targets.
2. What Resources Are Available for It?
Accountability for results requires the corresponding capacity to execute. Depending on the mandate, this includes a capable team, access to relevant data and management information, a budget and the support of central functions.
3. Which Decisions May the Role Make on Its Own?
In cross-functional mandates in particular, the scope for action directly affects the speed of execution. Whoever is accountable for results must be able to set priorities, steer resources and escalate conflicting objectives within clearly defined limits.
This is not about maximum autonomy but about a clear allocation of responsibility and decision-making authority.
The central management task, therefore, is not to commission a search as early as possible. It is to derive the mandate from the company’s strategic objectives and translate it into clear accountability for results, decision-making authority and resources.
Once the mandate has been clarified, the question of the appropriate appointment model arises.
A permanent appointment makes sense when the long-term target picture for the function is clear and the company is looking for a leader who will develop the organization beyond the current transformation phase. The profile must then fit both the present task and the future role.
An interim solution is appropriate when additional leadership capacity or specific transformation experience is needed at short notice. This can be relevant for an integration as well as for building new structures, international growth or a time-bound change agenda. Responsibility can be assumed quickly without putting a long-term staffing decision under unnecessary time pressure.
A hybrid model combines both time horizons. An interim executive initially takes on the operational mandate and creates clarity on structures, priorities and long-term requirements. In parallel, the permanent appointment is prepared.
The choice of appointment model thus becomes a business decision: It follows from the task, the time horizon and the maturity of the role.
A clearly defined mandate improves not only the role profile but also the quality of the selection process.
Résumés and previous positions provide important signals. However, they show only to a limited extent how an executive will act under the specific conditions of the new mandate. For key roles, selection should therefore focus more strongly on actual decision-making and execution capability.
The decisive questions are those that come as close as possible to the real task: What priorities would the person set in the first few months? What information would they need? How would they resolve conflicting objectives between functions? Which stakeholders would they involve, and when?
Past successes should also be examined for the individual’s personal contribution. What counts is not the size of a project but which decisions an executive made personally, what resistance they overcame and which results they were directly accountable for.
The same applies to supposedly soft criteria. Communication skills, assertiveness or entrepreneurial thinking only become robust selection criteria once it is clear what behavior they mean in the specific mandate.
For business-critical roles, the classic focus on “Quality of Hire” falls short. What matters is the impact of the chosen appointment—regardless of whether it is permanent, interim or hybrid. For this broader perspective on impact, Quality of Placement is the more accurate yardstick: How quickly does an executive become effective in the defined mandate, and are the agreed targets achieved?
Depending on the role, different criteria may be relevant: time-to-impact, defined transformation milestones, the implementation of strategic initiatives, building or developing the leadership team, and measurable operational or financial results. The quality of the appointment thus becomes a business metric. For management and shareholders, what counts is not the completion of the search but the demonstrable impact of the chosen leadership solution.
Companies should not wait until a position becomes vacant to address business-critical roles. Growth, internationalization, acquisitions and new business models continuously change which leadership capabilities are needed.
For management, shareholders and advisory boards, this raises key questions: Which roles are particularly relevant for the next stages of development? Which capabilities are already in place? Where are gaps emerging? And which tasks require permanent leadership capacity, while others can deliberately remain time-limited?
This perspective connects succession planning, executive search and interim management into a common appointment logic. It helps to distinguish short-term capacity needs from long-term capability building and to prepare options before a key role becomes a bottleneck.
At the upper end of the German Mittelstand in particular, growth and increasing organizational complexity often change leadership requirements faster than existing role structures can keep pace. What successfully carried the company through one phase therefore does not automatically fit the next.
Strategic leadership planning thus makes leadership capacity part of corporate management: The critical capabilities must be available where they make the greatest difference to executing the next strategic stage.
In phases with high decision-making and time pressure, every minute counts. When key roles in finance, operations, or project management are vacant, implementation becomes a risk—in times of crisis, but also during growth, transformation, or transition phases. In such situations, tailor-made interim and executive search solutions bring targeted leadership experience and implementation expertise to the company. They create additional certainty by clearly anchoring responsibility, driving decisions forward, and confidently involving relevant stakeholders. The decisive factor here is not only the speed of recruitment, but also the ability to actually make an impact in challenging phases. In this interview, Anne Rienecker, head of enomyc's new People Advisory business unit, and managing director Julia Hammer explain how they support medium-sized companies with their services and why even the best interim manager is not a “jack of all trades.
Mergers & Acquisitions
Succession, more expensive capital and more selective valuations are increasing the number of complex ownership situations in Germany's industrial Mittelstand. The advantage goes to those who select targets early, finance them through the downside, and create value after closing.
Mergers & Acquisitions
What effect does the family factor have on change processes in family businesses? Our partner Dr. Tim Bauer researched this topic years ago. In 2012, he completed his PhD on "Innovation Processes in Family Businesses." Prior to that, he worked at the Chair for Family Businesses, advised young founders, and studied renowned family businesses from the German Mittelstand. That he now advises family businesses in transformation processes is partly because he himself comes from a family business and managed the company for a decade with his brother. How can family businesses respond to the current pressure to transform? What are their pain points? And what is essential in consulting for family businesses? Here are insights from his entrepreneurial and consulting practice.
Strategy & Corporate Performance
“There are three methods to gain wisdom,” Confucius once taught. “First, by reflection, which is noblest; second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third, by experience, which is the bitterest.” Is China taking the easy path? And will it prove bitter for Germany? How economic policy and the Mittelstand might respond to China's economic trajectory — Christian Zeller, Partner at enomyc, discusses this in the current interview.
